-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 5.5k
Danny/workflow invokes docs updates #14885
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request involves significant restructuring and content updates to the documentation for running workflows. Key changes include renaming the "Step configuration" section to "Configuring workflow steps" and introducing a new section on "Testing workflow steps." The document now emphasizes manual configuration for end users' authentication, updates the "Errors" section to "Troubleshooting," and enhances error handling with verbose messages. Overall, the document's flow has been improved for better clarity and user guidance. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx (3)
Line range hint
202-239: Fix formatting in the curl exampleThe curl example contains some formatting issues that could cause problems when users copy-paste:
curl -X POST https://{your-endpoint-url} \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer {access_token}" \ -H 'X-PD-External-User-ID: {your_external_user_id}' \ - -H 'X-PD-Environment: development' \ # 'development' or 'production' + -H 'X-PD-Environment: development' \ # 'development' or 'production' -d '{ "slackChannel": "#general", "messageText": "Hello, world!", "gitRepo": "AcmeOrg/acme-repo", "issueTitle": "Test Issue" }' \
240-253: Consider adding more testing guidanceThe testing section effectively covers the basic setup, but could be enhanced with:
- Examples of different testing scenarios (e.g., testing with users having different permission levels or account configurations)
- Environment-specific considerations (what differs between development and production testing)
Would you like me to propose additional content for these testing scenarios?
254-263: Enhance error documentationConsider improving the troubleshooting section by:
- Adding unique error codes or identifiers for each error type
- Including examples of the verbose error messages that users might encounter
- Adding links to relevant API documentation for error handling
Would you like me to propose a structured format for documenting these errors with examples?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx (1)
Line range hint 1-263: Verify documentation references and links
Let's ensure all referenced endpoints and UI elements are accurate.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the documentation references and links found in the workflows.mdx file to verify the concern. I'll generate additional scripts to check for any potential issues.
Let me verify the content of the workflows.mdx file to ensure all references and functionality are properly documented.
Based on the comprehensive review of the documentation, I can now provide a final response:
Documentation is accurate and well-structured
The documentation for running workflows for end users is complete and accurate, with:
- Clear step-by-step instructions
- Code examples in multiple languages (TypeScript, Node.js, cURL)
- Proper references to all required components (OAuth, Connect, external users)
- Detailed troubleshooting section
- Accurate cross-references to other documentation sections
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify documentation references
# Check for broken internal links
echo "Checking for internal documentation references..."
rg -l '\[.*?\]\(/[^)]+\)' | while read -r file; do
rg -o '\[.*?\]\(/([^)]+)\)' "$file" | cut -d':' -f2 | while read -r link; do
echo "Found internal link: $link"
done
done
# Check for API endpoint references
echo "Checking API endpoint references..."
rg -l 'https://api\.pipedream\.com/v1/' | while read -r file; do
rg 'https://api\.pipedream\.com/v1/[^\s\'"]+' "$file"
done
Length of output: 131070
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the specific file and its references
echo "Checking workflows.mdx file and its references..."
rg -l "Running workflows for your end users" docs-v2/pages/connect/
# Check for related API endpoints
echo "Checking for related API endpoints..."
rg -l "invokeWorkflowForExternalUser" docs-v2/pages/
# Check for Connect-related documentation
echo "Checking for Connect documentation..."
rg -l "Pipedream Connect" docs-v2/pages/connect/
# Check for OAuth client documentation
echo "Checking for OAuth client documentation..."
rg -l "Create a Pipedream OAuth client" docs-v2/pages/
Length of output: 1116
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the workflows.mdx file
echo "Checking content of workflows.mdx..."
cat docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx
# Check for any related API documentation
echo "Checking for API documentation references..."
rg -A 5 "invokeWorkflowForExternalUser" docs-v2/pages/connect/
Length of output: 13834
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx (4)
Line range hint
202-239: Enhance the curl example for clarity and securityThe configuration section is well-explained, but the curl example could be improved:
Consider these improvements to the curl example:
curl -X POST https://{your-endpoint-url} \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer {access_token}" \ - -H 'X-PD-External-User-ID: {your_external_user_id}' \ - -H 'X-PD-Environment: development' \ # 'development' or 'production' + -H "X-PD-External-User-ID: ${EXTERNAL_USER_ID}" \ + -H "X-PD-Environment: ${PD_ENVIRONMENT}" \ -d '{ "slackChannel": "#general", "messageText": "Hello, world!", - "gitRepo": "AcmeOrg/acme-repo", + "gitRepo": "org/repo", "issueTitle": "Test Issue" }' \This:
- Uses environment variables for sensitive values
- Uses consistent quote style
- Uses a more generic example for the git repo
252-252: Fix typo in environment setting instruction-3. Make sure `x-pd-environment` is set (you'll likely want to `development`) +3. Make sure `x-pd-environment` is set (you'll likely want to use `development`)
265-278: Enhance error example and add cross-referencesThe error example is helpful but could be improved:
- Add a link to the general error handling documentation for additional context
- Consider improving the curl example:
curl -X POST https://{your-endpoint-url} \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer {access_token}' \ - -H "x-pd-environment: development" \ - -H "x-pd-external-user-id: abc-123" \ + -H "X-PD-Environment: development" \ + -H "X-PD-External-User-ID: abc-123" \ -d '{ "slackChannel": "#general", "messageText": "Hello, world! (sent via curl)", "hubSpotList": "prospects", "contactEmail": "[email protected]" }' \This maintains consistent header casing with the rest of the documentation.
280-280: Consider adding error codes for easier referenceConsider adding unique error codes to each error type to make it easier for developers to reference and document them. For example:
#### No external user ID passed (ERR_PD_001) ... #### No matching external user ID (ERR_PD_002) ...
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit